Federal Court of Justice ruling provides clarity: Borrowers receive more protection
In its ruling of February 20, 2025 (Case No. I ZR 122/23), the Federal Court of Justice (BGH) significantly tightened the disclosure obligations of loan brokers. Anyone who signs a mortgage agreement early on the advice of a broker and later has to pay a so-called non-acceptance fee may, under certain conditions, be entitled to compensation. The decision affects thousands of borrowers nationwide and opens up new possibilities for reclaiming payments already made.
What exactly is a non-acceptance compensation?
A non-acceptance fee is a penalty payment that banks demand when a loan agreement that has already been concluded is not disbursed, for example, because a real estate transaction falls through. Unlike a prepayment penalty, which is charged for early repayment of an existing loan, a non-acceptance fee relates to the loan not being drawn upon at all. The financial consequences for those affected can be severe.
The case before the Federal Court of Justice: Contract signed – but the property was never purchased.
In this case, a married couple, acting on the recommendation of a broker, took out a loan before signing the purchase agreement. After the seller unexpectedly withdrew from the purchase, the loan was not drawn down. The bank nevertheless demanded a non-acceptance fee of over €35,000 – and the couple paid. They then sued for damages – and won.
Key message of the ruling: Intermediaries must point out risks.
The Federal Court of Justice ruled that the advice given did not meet the required standards. The intermediary should have explicitly pointed out that significant costs would still be incurred in the event of a failed purchase. Furthermore, she should have presented safer alternatives.
- the conclusion of the loan agreement only after the conclusion of the purchase agreement,
- or a contract arrangement with a suspensive condition.
Because these warnings were missing, the couple was awarded damages. The ruling is considered a significant step forward in consumer protection, particularly in real estate financing.
What does this mean specifically for borrowers?
Anyone who has paid a non-acceptance fee should have their contracts reviewed. Even in cases that have already been concluded, it may be possible to assert claims, provided the statute of limitations has not yet expired. Besides the date of signing, the quality of the advice provided by the intermediary is also crucial.
Legal support provided by the law firm Cocron
The law firm Cocron, specializing in consumer law, assists clients nationwide in enforcing claims for damages due to inadequate advice from insurance brokers. Attorney István Cocron, founder of Cocron GmbH & Co. KG, emphasizes:
“Many intermediaries pressure people to sign contracts quickly without fully pointing out the risks. This ruling confirms: Those who were not adequately informed have a good chance of getting their money back.”
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
When does incorrect advice occur?
If no information was provided regarding the risk of non-acceptance compensation or possible alternatives.
Who is liable for the damage?
Usually the loan broker, but possibly also the brokering company.
How long can I make claims?
Generally within three years of becoming aware of the claim, but no more than ten years after the conclusion of the contract.
Will my legal expenses insurance cover the costs?
Many legal expenses insurance policies cover such cases. The Cocron law firm will, upon request, submit the inquiry to the insurance company free of charge.
Take action now: Secure your free initial assessment!
Did you pay a non-acceptance fee or sign a loan agreement that you ultimately did not use?
Then have your claims legally reviewed now!
📩 Simple, digital and nationwide in Germany.
