\u00c7evrimi\u00e7i ko\u00e7luk seanslar\u0131 her zaman kat\u0131l\u0131mc\u0131n\u0131n bekledi\u011fi sonu\u00e7lar\u0131 vermeyebiliyor. Ancak, pahal\u0131 bir ko\u00e7luk s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinden kurtulman\u0131n yollar\u0131 vard\u0131r. Bu durum, Stuttgart Y\u00fcksek B\u00f6lge Mahkemesi’nin 29 A\u011fustos 2024 tarihli karar\u0131yla da ortaya konmu\u015ftur. Y\u00fcksek B\u00f6lge Mahkemesi, kat\u0131l\u0131mc\u0131n\u0131n \u00e7evrimi\u00e7i ko\u00e7luk i\u00e7in daha \u00f6nce \u00f6dedi\u011fi yakla\u015f\u0131k 24.000 euro tutar\u0131ndaki \u00fccretin kendisine iade edilece\u011fine ve ba\u015fka herhangi bir \u00f6deme yapmas\u0131na gerek kalmayaca\u011f\u0131na h\u00fckmetti.<\/p>\n\n
Celle Y\u00fcksek B\u00f6lge Mahkemesi, 1 Mart 2023 tarihli tarihi bir karar\u0131nda, uzaktan e\u011fitim koruma yasas\u0131 (FernUSG) uyar\u0131nca e\u011fitmen veya sa\u011flay\u0131c\u0131n\u0131n lisans\u0131 yoksa, \u00e7evrimi\u00e7i ko\u00e7luk s\u00f6zle\u015fmelerinin ge\u00e7ersiz say\u0131labilece\u011fine h\u00fckmetti. Avukat Istv\u00e1n Cocron, “Stuttgart Y\u00fcksek B\u00f6lge Mahkemesi de karar\u0131nda bu g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fc benimsedi”<\/em> diyor.<\/p>\n\n S\u00f6z konusu davada, davac\u0131 40.000 euro kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131nda birka\u00e7 ayl\u0131k i\u015f ko\u00e7lu\u011fu s\u00f6zle\u015fmesi imzalam\u0131\u015ft\u0131. Birka\u00e7 hafta sonra, \u00e7evrimi\u00e7i ko\u00e7lu\u011fun beklentilerini kar\u015f\u0131lamad\u0131\u011f\u0131 sonucuna varmak zorunda kald\u0131. Hizmet sa\u011flay\u0131c\u0131 s\u00f6zle\u015fmenin feshedilmesini kabul etmeyi reddetti. Ancak, kat\u0131l\u0131mc\u0131n\u0131n a\u00e7t\u0131\u011f\u0131 dava Stuttgart Y\u00fcksek B\u00f6lge Mahkemesi’nde ba\u015far\u0131yla sonu\u00e7land\u0131.<\/p>\n\n Y\u00fcksek B\u00f6lge Mahkemesi, \u00e7evrimi\u00e7i ko\u00e7luk s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinin Uzaktan E\u011fitim Yasas\u0131n\u0131 ihlal etti\u011fine ve bu nedenle ge\u00e7ersiz oldu\u011funa h\u00fckmetti. Bu nedenle davac\u0131, ko\u00e7luk i\u00e7in daha \u00f6nce \u00f6dedi\u011fi \u00fccretlerin iadesini alma hakk\u0131na sahiptir ve ba\u015fka bir \u00f6deme yapmas\u0131 gerekmemektedir.<\/p>\n\n Y\u00fcksek B\u00f6lge Mahkemesi, karar\u0131n\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131klarken, imzalanan s\u00f6zle\u015fmenin Uzaktan E\u011fitim Koruma Yasas\u0131 kapsam\u0131na girdi\u011fini belirtti. Tipik \u00f6zellikler aras\u0131nda, bilgi aktar\u0131m\u0131 i\u00e7in \u00fccret \u00f6denmesi ve kat\u0131l\u0131mc\u0131lar\u0131n e\u011fitmenlerden b\u00fcy\u00fck \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcde mek\u00e2nsal olarak ayr\u0131lmas\u0131 gibi unsurlar mevcuttur. \u00c7\u00fcnk\u00fc ko\u00e7luk esas olarak e\u011fitim videolar\u0131 ve \u00e7evrimi\u00e7i toplant\u0131lar arac\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131yla ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirildi. Ayr\u0131ca, kat\u0131l\u0131mc\u0131lar \u00e7evrimi\u00e7i toplant\u0131lar veya grup sohbetleri s\u0131ras\u0131nda soru sorma f\u0131rsat\u0131 buldular. Bu ayn\u0131 zamanda \u00f6\u011frenme ilerlemesinin izlenmesine de olanak tan\u0131r.<\/p>\n\n Stuttgart Y\u00fcksek B\u00f6lge Mahkemesi (OLG Stuttgart), s\u00f6zle\u015fmenin Uzaktan E\u011fitim Koruma Yasas\u0131 kapsam\u0131na girmesi i\u00e7in gereken t\u00fcm \u015fartlar\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131lad\u0131\u011f\u0131na h\u00fckmetti. Bu, sa\u011flay\u0131c\u0131n\u0131n uzaktan e\u011fitim kurslar\u0131 i\u00e7in uygun akreditasyona sahip olmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi anlam\u0131na geliyor. Avukat Cocron, “Bu akreditasyon nadiren verilir ve bu davada mevcuttu”<\/em> dedi. Bu nedenle Stuttgart Y\u00fcksek B\u00f6lge Mahkemesi, akdedilen s\u00f6zle\u015fmenin 7. madde uyar\u0131nca ge\u00e7ersiz oldu\u011funa h\u00fckmetmi\u015ftir. FernUSG’nin 1. maddesi ge\u00e7ersizdir ve davac\u0131 paras\u0131n\u0131 geri al\u0131r.<\/p>\n\n Alman Mesafeli Sat\u0131\u015f Yasas\u0131’n\u0131n (FernUSG) ihlalinin yan\u0131 s\u0131ra, ko\u00e7luk s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinin feshedilmesini hakl\u0131 \u00e7\u0131karabilecek ba\u015fka nedenler de olabilir. Avukat Cocron: “Bir s\u00f6zle\u015fme ahlaks\u0131z ise de ge\u00e7ersizdir. Ahlaks\u0131zl\u0131k, edim ve edim aras\u0131nda b\u00fcy\u00fck bir orant\u0131s\u0131zl\u0131k oldu\u011funda ortaya \u00e7\u0131kar.”<\/em><\/p>\n\n <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" \u00c7evrimi\u00e7i ko\u00e7luk seanslar\u0131 her zaman kat\u0131l\u0131mc\u0131n\u0131n bekledi\u011fi sonu\u00e7lar\u0131 vermeyebiliyor. Ancak, pahal\u0131 bir ko\u00e7luk s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinden kurtulman\u0131n yollar\u0131 vard\u0131r. Bu durum, Stuttgart Y\u00fcksek B\u00f6lge Mahkemesi’nin 29 A\u011fustos 2024 tarihli karar\u0131yla da ortaya konmu\u015ftur. Y\u00fcksek B\u00f6lge Mahkemesi, kat\u0131l\u0131mc\u0131n\u0131n \u00e7evrimi\u00e7i ko\u00e7luk i\u00e7in daha \u00f6nce \u00f6dedi\u011fi yakla\u015f\u0131k 24.000 euro tutar\u0131ndaki \u00fccretin kendisine iade edilece\u011fine ve ba\u015fka herhangi bir \u00f6deme yapmas\u0131na […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"template":"","news-kategorie":[69],"class_list":["post-4632","news","type-news","status-publish","hentry","news-kategorie-cevrimici-kocluk"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/ra-cocron.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/news\/4632","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/ra-cocron.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/news"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/ra-cocron.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/news"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/ra-cocron.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4632"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"news-kategorie","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ra-cocron.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/news-kategorie?post=4632"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}