Almanya’n\u0131n \u00e7evrimi\u00e7i kumar yasa\u011f\u0131, \u00e7ocuklar\u0131n ve oyuncular\u0131n korunmas\u0131 gibi kamu yarar\u0131na y\u00f6nelik hedefleri g\u00f6zetmektedir. Avrupa Adalet Divan\u0131, 2010 y\u0131l\u0131nda kamu yarar\u0131na hizmet eden ulusal k\u0131s\u0131tlamalar\u0131n Avrupa hukukunu ihlal etmedi\u011fini a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a belirtmi\u015ftir. M\u00fcnster B\u00f6lge Mahkemesi, Avrupa Adalet Divan\u0131’n\u0131n hukuki g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcn de\u011fi\u015fti\u011fine dair hi\u00e7bir i\u015faret g\u00f6rmedi\u011fini a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a belirtti. Bu nedenle, 16 Ocak 2025 tarihli karar\u0131yla bir oyuncunun geri \u00f6deme taleplerine ili\u015fkin yarg\u0131lamalar\u0131n ask\u0131ya al\u0131nmas\u0131 kald\u0131r\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Duru\u015fma k\u0131sa s\u00fcre i\u00e7inde ger\u00e7ekle\u015febilir. Avrupa Adalet Divan\u0131’ndan ek bir karara gerek yoktur.<\/p>\n\n
Eski Kumar Anla\u015fmas\u0131’n\u0131n 4. B\u00f6l\u00fcm 4. Maddesine g\u00f6re, \u00e7evrimi\u00e7i kumar Almanya’da genel olarak yasakt\u0131. Bu yasak, 1 Temmuz 2021’de operat\u00f6rlerin Almanya’da kumar hizmetleri i\u00e7in lisans ba\u015fvurusunda bulunmalar\u0131na izin verilerek k\u0131smen gev\u015fetildi. Bu lisans olmadan \u00e7evrimi\u00e7i kumar yasa d\u0131\u015f\u0131 olmaya devam ediyor. Avukat Istv\u00e1n Cocron, “Bunun sonucu olarak, oyuncular yasakl\u0131 kumardan kaynaklanan kay\u0131plar\u0131n\u0131 operat\u00f6rlerden geri alabilirler” diyor.<\/p>\n\n
Bir\u00e7ok mahkeme, oyuncular\u0131n para iadesi alma hakk\u0131n\u0131 zaten onaylam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. \u00c7e\u015fitli \u00e7evrimi\u00e7i kumar sa\u011flay\u0131c\u0131lar\u0131, Almanya’n\u0131n getirdi\u011fi yasa\u011f\u0131n Avrupa’da hizmet sunma \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc ihlal etti\u011fini savunuyor. Bu soruyu a\u00e7\u0131kl\u0131\u011fa kavu\u015fturmak i\u00e7in Malta mahkemesi konuyu Avrupa Adalet Divan\u0131’na sevk etti. Yarg\u0131lama s\u00fcreci halen devam etmektedir. Ancak, Avrupa Adalet Divan\u0131’n\u0131n karar\u0131n\u0131 beklerken, baz\u0131 mahkemeler oyuncular\u0131n tazminat taleplerine ili\u015fkin davalar\u0131 ask\u0131ya ald\u0131.<\/p>\n\n
M\u00fcnster B\u00f6lge Mahkemesi, yarg\u0131laman\u0131n ask\u0131ya al\u0131nmas\u0131na ili\u015fkin karar\u0131 bozdu. Mahkemenin g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcne g\u00f6re, Avrupa Adalet Divan\u0131’n\u0131n (EuGH), Alman Kumar Devlet S\u00f6zle\u015fmesi’ndeki yasa\u011f\u0131 Avrupa Birli\u011fi hukukuna ayk\u0131r\u0131 ilan edece\u011fine dair \u201chi\u00e7bir neden\u201d<\/em> bulunmamaktad\u0131r. Alman Y\u00fcksek B\u00f6lge Mahkemeleri ve Federal Adalet Divan\u0131 da yasa\u011f\u0131n AB hukukuna uygun oldu\u011fu y\u00f6n\u00fcnde oybirli\u011fiyle karar vermi\u015fti. Federal Y\u00fcksek Mahkeme (BGH) yak\u0131n zamanda yarg\u0131lamay\u0131 ask\u0131ya alm\u0131\u015f olsa da, bu durum mahkemenin farkl\u0131 bir hukuki g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fe vard\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve Alman yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131 Avrupa hukukunun ihlali olarak de\u011ferlendirdi\u011fi anlam\u0131na gelmez, diye devam etti mahkeme.<\/p>\n\n \u00c7evrimi\u00e7i spor bahisleri davas\u0131nda, Alman Federal Y\u00fcksek Mahkemesi (BGH), ilgili bir lisans olmadan yap\u0131lan s\u00f6zle\u015fmeleri ge\u00e7ersiz sayd\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a belirtti. Ancak, spor bahisleri sa\u011flay\u0131c\u0131s\u0131 bir lisans ba\u015fvurusunda bulunmu\u015ftu. Lisanslama prosed\u00fcr\u00fc Avrupa hukukuna uygun olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 i\u00e7in hi\u00e7bir izin verilemedi. Avukat Cocron, “Bu nedenle Avrupa Adalet Divan\u0131 (ECJ), BGH’nin kabul etti\u011fi gibi, yasa\u011f\u0131n bu ko\u015fullar alt\u0131nda bile ge\u00e7erli olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131kl\u0131\u011fa kavu\u015fturmal\u0131d\u0131r” dedi.<\/p>\n\n Kumar Anla\u015fmas\u0131’ndaki yasak, di\u011fer \u015feylerin yan\u0131 s\u0131ra, gen\u00e7leri ve kumarbazlar\u0131 y\u0131k\u0131c\u0131 davran\u0131\u015flardan korumay\u0131 ve doland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u00f6nlemeyi ama\u00e7lamaktad\u0131r. Avukat Cocron, “Avrupa Adalet Divan\u0131 2010 y\u0131l\u0131nda, kumar ba\u011f\u0131ml\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131na veya ilgili su\u00e7lara kar\u015f\u0131 koruma gibi kamu yarar\u0131na hizmet etmeleri halinde ulusal yasaklar\u0131n kabul edilebilir oldu\u011funa karar vermi\u015ftir. \u0130\u00e7tihat\u0131n\u0131 de\u011fi\u015ftirmesi beklenmemelidir” diyor.<\/p>\n\n G\u00f6r\u00fcn\u00fc\u015fe g\u00f6re M\u00fcnster B\u00f6lge Mahkemesi de bu g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fc payla\u015f\u0131yor. A\u00e7\u0131klamada, “Avrupa Adalet Divan\u0131’n\u0131n aksi y\u00f6nde bir karar verme olas\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n son derece d\u00fc\u015f\u00fck oldu\u011fu g\u00f6z \u00f6n\u00fcne al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda”, davan\u0131n daha fazla ask\u0131ya al\u0131nmas\u0131n\u0131n davac\u0131 i\u00e7in art\u0131k makul olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a belirtildi.<\/p>\n\n Avukat Cocron, “Oyuncular\u0131n yasad\u0131\u015f\u0131 \u00e7evrimi\u00e7i kumar oyunlar\u0131ndan kaynaklanan kay\u0131plar\u0131n\u0131 telafi etme \u015fanslar\u0131 hala y\u00fcksek ve taleplerini derhal ileri s\u00fcrmeli, Avrupa Adalet Divan\u0131’ndan bir karar beklememelidirler. \u00d6zellikle de taleplerinin zaman a\u015f\u0131m\u0131na u\u011frayabilece\u011fi g\u00f6z \u00f6n\u00fcne al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda,”<\/em> dedi.<\/p>\n\n <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Almanya’n\u0131n \u00e7evrimi\u00e7i kumar yasa\u011f\u0131, \u00e7ocuklar\u0131n ve oyuncular\u0131n korunmas\u0131 gibi kamu yarar\u0131na y\u00f6nelik hedefleri g\u00f6zetmektedir. Avrupa Adalet Divan\u0131, 2010 y\u0131l\u0131nda kamu yarar\u0131na hizmet eden ulusal k\u0131s\u0131tlamalar\u0131n Avrupa hukukunu ihlal etmedi\u011fini a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a belirtmi\u015ftir. M\u00fcnster B\u00f6lge Mahkemesi, Avrupa Adalet Divan\u0131’n\u0131n hukuki g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcn de\u011fi\u015fti\u011fine dair hi\u00e7bir i\u015faret g\u00f6rmedi\u011fini a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a belirtti. Bu nedenle, 16 Ocak 2025 tarihli karar\u0131yla bir oyuncunun […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"template":"","news-kategorie":[69],"class_list":["post-4517","news","type-news","status-publish","hentry","news-kategorie-cevrimici-kocluk"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/ra-cocron.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/news\/4517","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/ra-cocron.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/news"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/ra-cocron.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/news"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/ra-cocron.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4517"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"news-kategorie","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ra-cocron.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/news-kategorie?post=4517"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}